Recycled picture, new post
Whenever the Jesus story comes face to face with reality, it fails. The nativity stories, which only Matthew and Luke think to invent include, are a case in point.
- Luke tells us the Emperor Augustus decreed there should be a census in what we now know as 4BC. He didn’t. The closest Roman census was in AD6, ten years later and it didn’t entail hordes of people trailing back to their ancestral village.
- Matthew claims that Herod was so enraged about the birth of the ‘royal’ baby that he killed all little boys under two years old. Except he didn’t. This never happened.
- According to the same story, a host of supernatural beings appeared announcing that a young woman who’d never had sex with a man had given birth, while a wandering star shone directly over her house.
Where in reality do these kinds of things happen? That’s right: in myths and stories. They are typical literary tropes found in fantasy fiction. The ‘miraculous’ events of the nativity are of this genre.
- Christians who delude themselves into thinking theirs is an intellectual faith concede the nativity is mythical, its events symbolic. They’re not usually so hot on what they’re symbolic of but say the story conveys truth. Still, they insist, the rest of the Jesus story is true. Evangelicals go even further and say it’s literally true. So, Jesus walking on water really happened (or if your faith is, oxymoronically, intellectual faith, it didn’t.) After all, the illusionist Dynamo walked across the Thames a few years ago (see it here), and if he could walk on water then how much more capable of doing that was the Son of God. Except the modern illusionist‘s feat was – yes, you guessed it – an illusion. So even if Jesus did the same thing, his trick was also an illusion. Those who say the story is included in Mark and Matthew because it’s actually only a parable about faith (or something) are conceding, again, that it didn’t actually happen.
- Likewise when Jesus turns water into wine, calms the storm, raises the dead, chats with apparitions of long dead Jewish folk-heroes and does every other ‘miracle’ he’s credited with. If they’re only symbolic then, by definition, they didn’t happen. Nor did they happen, if, as Evangelicals believe, they’re being passed off as real events. ‘Miracles’ do not happen in reality. Never have, never will. They happen only in stories.
Well, okay, more enlightened Christians might say, but nonetheless Jesus conveyed to the world what God wanted us to know. He was wise and compassionate and told us how our sins could be forgiven. Except his wisdom comes directly from Jewish scriptures; he had nothing new to say. He was no more compassionate than anyone else and could in fact be an absolute s**t. He was inconsistent across the gospels about how sins were forgiven and much of his teaching in the original Gospel (Mark’s) is lifted from Paul or reflects the beliefs of the early Christ cult. Jesus the holy man is a construct – or rather a series of constructs, a literary device, not a real man.
So, okay; the nativity didn’t happen as depicted. The astounding feats attributed to Jesus didn’t happen and Jesus is whoever the various gospel writers and Paul want to make him. Nothing we’ve seen so far is factually, historically or really (as in reality) true.
But, the crucifixion and resurrection are! Oh yes. The rest is made up, but these two events most certainly are not.
- Even though Jesus’ trial is historically inaccurate and is, as a consequence, highly implausible.
- Even though there was no-one to record Jesus’s snappy repartee (or silence depending on which gospel you read) with Pilate or Herod.
- Even though there was no such Roman custom as releasing a prisoner on the Passover.
- Even though the synoptics have Jesus crucified on Friday while John says it was a Thursday.
- Even though characters like Barabbas, Joseph of Arimathea, Mary Magdelene and the ‘disciple whom Jesus loved’ are evidently and entirely fictional.
- Even though there was no eclipse of the sun that lasted for hours.
- Even though there was no earthquake that shook zombies loose from their graves before Jesus had a chance to rise and shine himself.
Such things are not historical. They’re not even feasible. They did not happen in reality. Well, if not the crucifixion per se, Christians say, then definitely the resurrection: that most unlikely of all unlikely events. That really happened.
- Even though the reports of it are completely at odds with one another.
- Even though angels are involved once again.
- Even though Jesus behaves entirely like a ghost, walking through closed doors, altering his appearance and vanishing at will.
- Even though he levitates into the clouds.
- Even though some of the disciples find it impossible to believe he’s back.
- Even though dead people rise only in stories, myths, legends and fantasies.
- Even though, in reality, dead people do not come back to life after three days, which is why Jesus didn’t either.
Still, I’m sure I’ll be told when I go to a carol service with my friends in a few days, that the story of Jesus’ birth, emotionally powerful as it is, is true from start to finish. Why? Because people’s capacity for believing fantasy stories knows no bounds.
Excellent summation, Neil, you heathen!
I hear Santa just struck you off his list for being a blasphemer!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Damn! And Santa’s someone I do believe in.
”Well, Tough- titty for you, fish face!”
to paraphrase Life of Brian.,
Good stuff, nice summation; I’m likin it! As far as the resurrection is concerned, not only didn’t that happen, but there is no way on this green Earth (still, a little) that Pilate lets anyone off the cross; no way, no how. He was known for his brutality; even to his own troops his punishments were harsh and brutal. There’s no way he lets a Jewish insurrectionist off the cross to placate some Jews over the Passover burial traditions. That is simply laughable.
You really have to jack up the cognitive dissonance to “MAXIMUM OVERRIDE” in order to buy into this nonsense but, somehow, they’re out there in vast numbers I guess!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Absolutely right. It’s highly unlikely Pilate would even know of a Jewish peasant facing execution, let alone meet with him face-to-face.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, yeah, and the OTHER barrel of bullshit: He supposedly releases Barabbas (whose name literally means “Son of the Father”) a rebel and a known murderer of Roman citizens go to prosecute Jesus whom he see “no fault” in? there is no way this ever happened.
LikeLiked by 1 person