Some Pig: Why God’s laws are not written on our hearts

Morals

According to Christians, everyone of us knows the right way to behave because God has written his laws in our ‘hearts’. We don’t always bother to consult what he’s written there, however, because we prefer to do our own thing, which is when our consciences start to bother us about our wicked ways. Here’s how Paul put in Romans 2.15:

Gentiles show that the work of the law is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness, and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even excuse them.

There’s no evidence that this is how it works, of course; Paul never cared much for evidence nor even for making sense. We know that, provided we are not born with psychopathic tendencies, we learn values, morals and how to relate to others from care-givers in our early lives. They teach us to share (or not) and how we should treat other people, and while it’s true we do seem to be born with a sense of empathy – watch a young child respond to the distress of another – this needs to be cultivated and nurtured. A knowledge of the 613, frequently absurd stipulations of the Old Covenant (which is what Paul is referring to) is demonstrably not genetic; we do not have an innate or instinctive understanding of God’s requirements. Psychologists point to the fact that it is only when she is three that a child learns that stealing is wrong; she is not born knowing it.

All of which is a far cry from ‘God’s law being written in (our) hearts’. Even if Paul meant we have a sort of general, non-specific understanding of how we ought to behave – though this is not what he actually says – there is no evidence this has been planted in us by a supernatural being. Certainly not one that thinks slavery is okay and whose prohibition against killing doesn’t extend to tribes beyond one’s own.

The Christian approach to morality puts me in mind of Charlotte’s Web. In that great children’s book, Charlotte the spider adds messages to the webs she spins to help save her friend, Wilbur the pig, from slaughter. When the gullible humans in the story see ‘Some Pig’, ‘Radiant’, ‘Amazing’ and ‘Humble’ written in the webs, they inexplicably give the credit, not to Charlotte, but to Wilbur. No-one, either in the book itself nor in reviews, comments on the fact that it is not Wilbur who has these qualities, despite what the messages say, but the creature who made them (an anomaly I’m sure E. B. White was aware of when he wrote the book.)

If I might interpret Charlotte’s Web allegorically, we humans are Charlotte, while Wilbur, on whom everyone seems focused, is God. It is we who have developed moral codes throughout our existence, the latest versions of which our children learn from us, and attempt to follow (or not). Meanwhile, the likes of Paul and contemporary Christians refuse to give us one iota of credit. Instead, they insist, the credit goes to their god; a being nowhere near as pleasant as Wilbur, though he’s every bit as fictional – another of our creations, just like those moral codes we invented.

 

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Some Pig: Why God’s laws are not written on our hearts

  1. I can agree with your idea and assessment. On the idea that emotions or anything else is on the heart let me add this. I worked in an open Heart ICU. I have seen heart surgeries. I have seen the chest spread and the heart exposed. There is nothing written there. It is the brain from which all thought and emotions flow. There is however one way that the mind and the heart are alike. They are both things that need to be exercised and given care. Things we need go in and out of both. We don’t do well without either of them. I think how we treat the mind is as important as how we treat our hearts. Have a great weekend. Hugs

    Like

    • I guess Christians would say Paul was speaking metaphorically when he said God’s laws were written on our hearts. Believers always claim Paul and Jesus are being metaphorical when they don’t care for what they have to say or when they’re demonstrating their ignorance. I think this is what’s happening here; Paul would genuinely have thought that the heart was the seat of the emotions. This was the wide-spread belief at the time (see https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21302666.)

      But you’re right, nothing is written on that muscle, metaphorically or otherwise, by anyone; nor in the brain, the mind as it is structured during our early years, nor in DNA. Our brain is the creator of all of our internal experiences. In fact, everything that is not a part of the natural world is a creation of the human mind, including morality, religion and gods. Why can Christians not see this? Why do they instead credit everything to their god Wilbur… er, Yahweh?

      I can feel another post coming on.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s